Odbor kompatibility s právem ES
Úřad vlády ČR
I S A P
Informační Systém pro Aproximaci Práva
Databáze č. 17 : Databáze judikatury
ă Odbor kompatibility s právem ES, Úřad vlády ČR - určeno pouze pro potřebu ministerstev a ostatních ústředních orgánů

Číslo (Kód CELEX):
Number (CELEX Code):		61976J0013
Název:
Title: 		JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF 14 JULY 1976. GAETANO DONA V MARIO MANTERO. PRELIMINARY RULING REQUESTED BY THE GIUDICE CONCILIATORE, ROVIGO. CASE 13-76.
Publikace:
Publication:		REPORTS OF CASES 1976 PAGES 1333 - 1342
Předmět (klíčová slova):
Keywords		FREEDOM OF ESTABLISHMENT AND SERVICES;FREE MOVEMENT OF WORKERS;FREE MOVEMENT OF SERVICES;
Související předpisy:
Corresponding acts:		157E007;157E048;157E051;157E059;157E060;157E059;157E060
Odkaz na souvisejicí judikáty:
Corresponding Judgements:
Plný text:
Fulltext:		Ne

Fakta:


Názor soudu a komentář:


Shrnutí (Summary of the Judgment):
1. RULES OR A NATIONAL PRACTICE, EVEN ADOPTED BY A SPORTING ORGANIZATION, WHICH LIMIT THE RIGHT TO TAKE PART IN FOOTBALL MATCHES AS PROFESSIONAL OR SEMI-PROFESSIONAL PLAYERS SOLELY TO THE NATIONALS OF THE STATE IN QUESTION, ARE INCOMPATIBLE WITH ARTICLE 7 AND, AS THE CASE MAY BE, WITH ARTICLES 48 TO 51 OR 59 TO 66 OF THE TREATY, UNLESS SUCH RULES OR PRACTICE EXCLUDE FOREIGN PLAYERS FROM PARTICIPATION IN CERTAIN MATCHES FOR REASONS WHICH ARE NOT OF AN ECONOMIC NATURE, WHICH RELATE TO THE PARTICULAR NATURE AND CONTEXT OF SUCH MATCHES AND ARE THUS OF SPORTING INTEREST ONLY. IT IS FOR THE NATIONAL COURT TO DETERMINE THE NATURE OF THE ACTIVITIES SUBMITTED TO ITS JUDGMENT AND TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT ARTICLES 7, 48 AND 59 OF THE TREATY, WHICH ARE MANDATORY IN NATURE, IN ORDER TO JUDGE THE VALIDITY OR THE EFFECTS OF A PROVISION INSERTED INTO THE RULES OF A SPORTING ORGANIZATION.

2. ARTICLE 48 ON THE ONE HAND AND THE FIRST PARAGRAPH OF ARTICLE 59 AND THE THIRD PARAGRAPH OF ARTICLE 60 OF THE TREATY ON THE OTHER - THE LAST TWO PROVISIONS AT LEAST IN SO FAR AS THEY SEEK TO ABOLISH ANY DISCRIMINATION AGAINST A PERSON PROVIDING A SERVICE BY REASON OF HIS NATIONALITY OR THE FACT THAT HE RESIDES IN A MEMBER STATE OTHER THAN THAT IN WHICH THE SERVICE IS TO BE PROVIDED - HAVE A DIRECT EFFECT IN THE LEGAL ORDERS OF THE MEMBER STATES AND CONFER ON INDIVIDUALS RIGHTS WHICH NATIONAL COURTS MUST PROTECT.

Plný text judikátu (Entire text of the Judgment):