Odbor kompatibility s právem ES Úřad vlády ČR	I S A P Informační Systém pro Aproximaci Práva
	Databáze č. 17 : Databáze judikatury

ă Odbor kompatibility s právem ES, Úřad vlády ČR - určeno pouze pro potřebu ministerstev a ostatních ústředních orgánů


	Číslo (Kód CELEX): Number (CELEX Code):		61988J0016

	Název: Title:		JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF 24 OCTOBER 1989. COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES V COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. AUTHORISATION CONFERRED ON THE COMMISSION UNDER ARTICLE 145 AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BUDGET UNDER ARTICLE 205. CASE 16/88.

	Publikace: Publication:		REPORTS OF CASES 1989 PAGES 3457

	Předmět (klíčová slova): Keywords		AGRICULTURE;FISHERIES POLICY;

	Související předpisy: Corresponding acts:		387R3252

	Odkaz na souvisejicí judikáty: Corresponding Judgements:


	Plný text: Fulltext:		Ne

Fakta:

Názor soudu a komentář:

Shrnutí (Summary of the Judgment):
THE CONCEPT OF IMPLEMENTATION FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE THIRD INDENT OF ARTICLE 145 OF THE EEC TREATY AS AMENDED BY THE SINGLE EUROPEAN ACT COMPRISES BOTH THE DRAWING UP OF IMPLEMENTING RULES AND THE APPLICATION OF RULES TO SPECIFIC CASES BY MEANS OF ACTS OF INDIVIDUAL APPLICATION. SINCE THE TREATY USES THE WORD "IMPLEMENTATION" WITHOUT RESTRICTING IT BY THE ADDITION OF ANY FURTHER QUALIFICATION, THAT TERM CANNOT BE INTERPRETED SO AS TO EXCLUDE ACTS OF INDIVIDUAL APPLICATION. WHEN THE COUNCIL EXERCISES ITS RIGHT UNDER ARTICLE 145 TO MAKE THE ADOPTION OF DECISIONS OF INDIVIDUAL APPLICATION HAVING FINANCIAL EFFECTS WHICH IT EMPOWERS THE COMMISSION TO TAKE SUBJECT TO THE "MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE" PROCEDURE, WHICH IS ONE OF THE PROCEDURES PROVIDED FOR UNDER THAT ARTICLE, IT DOES NOT ENCROACH UPON THE COMMISSION' S POWER UNDER ARTICLE 205 OF THE TREATY TO IMPLEMENT THE BUDGET ON ITS OWN RESPONSIBILITY. THE COMMISSION' S POWER TO IMPLEMENT THE BUDGET IS NOT SUCH AS TO MODIFY THE DIVISION OF POWERS RESULTING FROM THE VAR
IOUS PROVISIONS OF THE TREATY WHICH AUTHORIZE THE COUNCIL AND THE COMMISSION TO ADOPT GENERALLY APPLICABLE OR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES WITHIN SPECIFIC AREAS, AND FROM THE INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS OF THE THIRD INDENT OF ARTICLE 145 AND ARTICLE 155. MOREOVER, EVEN THOUGH AN INDIVIDUAL MEASURE MAY ALMOST INEVITABLY ENTAIL THE COMMITMENT OF EXPENDITURE, THE TWO MUST BE DISTINGUISHED - PARTICULARLY SINCE THE POWER TO ADOPT THE ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION AND THE POWER TO COMMIT THE EXPENDITURE MAY BE ENTRUSTED, WITHIN THE INTERNAL ORGANIZATION OF EACH INSTITUTION, TO DIFFERENT OFFICIALS. THAT INTERPRETATION, WHICH RULES OUT THE POSSIBILITY THAT COMMITMENTS OF EXPENDITURE MIGHT IN THEMSELVES AND IRRESPECTIVE OF ANY SUBSTANTIVE DECISION IMPOSE LEGALLY BINDING OBLIGATIONS ON THE COMMUNITY VIS-ů-VIS THIRD PARTIES, IS, MOREOVER, IN CONFORMITY WITH THE SYSTEM OF SUPERVISION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BUDGET IN WHICH THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT HAS BEEN GIVEN, UNDER ARTICLE 206B OF THE TREATY, THE POWER TO GIVE A DISCHARGE TO THE C
OMMISSION, AND IN WHICH THE COURT OF AUDITORS IS REQUIRED TO ASSIST THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT WITHIN THE LIMITS DEFINED IN ARTICLE 206A(2) OF THE TREATY AND ARTICLE 80 OF THE FINANCIAL REGULATION.

Plný text judikátu (Entire text of the Judgment):