Odbor kompatibility s právem ES
Úřad vlády ČR
I S A P
Informační Systém pro Aproximaci Práva
Databáze č. 17 : Databáze judikatury
ă Odbor kompatibility s právem ES, Úřad vlády ČR - určeno pouze pro potřebu ministerstev a ostatních ústředních orgánů

Číslo (Kód CELEX):
Number (CELEX Code):
61992J0364
Název:
Title:
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF 19 JANUARY 1994. SAT FLUGGESELLSCHAFT MBH V EUROCONTROL. REFERENCE FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING: COUR DE CASSATION - BELGIUM. ARTICLES 86 AND 90 OF THE EEC TREATY - CONCEPT OF UNDERTAKING - INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION. CASE C-364/92.
Publikace:
Publication:
REPORTS OF CASES 1994 PAGES I-0043
Předmět (klíčová slova):
Keywords
COMPETITION;RULES APPLYING TO UNDERTAKINGS;DOMINANT POSITION;
Související předpisy:
Corresponding acts:
157E086;157E090
Odkaz na souvisejicí judikáty:
Corresponding Judgements:
Plný text:
Fulltext:
Ne

Fakta:


Názor soudu a komentář:


Shrnutí (Summary of the Judgment):
1. THE COURT HAS JURISDICTION TO GIVE PRELIMINARY RULINGS ON THE INTERPRETATION OF TREATY PROVISIONS PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 177 OF THE TREATY, WHICH ESTABLISHES DIRECT COOPERATION BETWEEN THE COURT AND NATIONAL COURTS OR TRIBUNALS BY WAY OF A NON-CONTENTIOUS PROCEDURE EXCLUDING ANY INITIATIVE OF THE PARTIES WHO ARE MERELY INVITED TO BE HEARD. THEREFORE, IF A NATIONAL COURT REFERS A QUESTION ON THE INTERPRETATION OF THE TREATY TO THE COURT, A PARTY TO THE MAIN PROCEEDINGS MAY NOT EFFECTIVELY CHALLENGE THE JURISDICTION OF THE COURT.

2. A PARTY TO THE MAIN PROCEEDINGS MAY NOT EFFECTIVELY CHALLENGE THE ADMISSIBILITY OF A QUESTION SUBMITTED FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING ON THE GROUND THAT THE NATIONAL COURT BASED ITS DECISION TO SET IN MOTION THE PROCEDURE UNDER ARTICLE 177 OF THE TREATY ON FINDINGS WHICH THE PARTY CLAIMS ARE INCORRECT.

3. ARTICLES 86 AND 90 OF THE TREATY ARE TO BE INTERPRETED AS MEANING THAT AN INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION SUCH AS EUROCONTROL DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN UNDERTAKING WITHIN THE MEANING OF THOSE ARTICLES. TAKEN AS A WHOLE, EUROCONTROL' S ACTIVITIES, INCLUDING THE COLLECTION OF ROUTE CHARGES ON BEHALF OF THE CONTRACTING STATES, ARE CONNECTED WITH THEIR NATURE, THEIR AIM AND THE RULES TO WHICH THEY ARE SUBJECT, TO THE EXERCISE OF POWERS RELATING TO THE CONTROL AND SUPERVISION OF AIR SPACE WHICH ARE TYPICALLY THOSE OF A PUBLIC AUTHORITY AND ARE NOT OF AN ECONOMIC NATURE JUSTIFYING THE APPLICATION OF THE TREATY RULES OF COMPETITION.

Plný text judikátu (Entire text of the Judgment):