Odbor kompatibility s právem ES
Úřad vlády ČR
I S A P
Informační Systém pro Aproximaci Práva
Databáze č. 17 : Databáze judikatury
ă Odbor kompatibility s právem ES, Úřad vlády ČR - určeno pouze pro potřebu ministerstev a ostatních ústředních orgánů

Číslo (Kód CELEX):
Number (CELEX Code):		61981J0314
Název:
Title: 		JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF 14 DECEMBER 1982. LE PROCUREUR DE LA REPUBLIQUE AND LE COMITE NATIONAL DE DEFENSE CONTRE L' ALCOOLISME V ALEX WATERKEYN AND OTHERS (CASE 314/81). LE PROCUREUR DE LA REPUBLIQUE AND LE COMITE NATIONAL DE DEFENSE CONTRE L' ALCOOLISME V JEAN CAYARD AND OTHERS (CASE 315/81). LE PROCUREUR DE LA REPUBLIQUE AND LE COMITE NATIONAL DE DEFENSE CONTRE L' ALCOOLISME V RODOLPHE JOEL AND OTHERS (CASE 316/81). LE PROCUREUR DE LA REPUBLIQUE V JEAN CAYARD AND OTHERS (CASE 83/82). REFERENCE FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING FROM THE TRIBUNAL DE GRANDE INSTANCE, PARIS. ADVERTISING OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES. JOINED CASES 314/81, 315/81, 316/81, 83/82.
Publikace:
Publication:		REPORTS OF CASES 1982 PAGES 4337 - 4362
Předmět (klíčová slova):
Keywords		AGRICULTURE;ALCOHOL;WINE;PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS;
Související předpisy:
Corresponding acts:		157E171
Odkaz na souvisejicí judikáty:
Corresponding Judgements:
Plný text:
Fulltext:		Ne

Fakta:


Názor soudu a komentář:


Shrnutí (Summary of the Judgment):
1. ALL THE INSTITUTIONS OF THE MEMBER STATE WHICH THE COURT FINDS TO HAVE FAILED TO FULFIL AN OBLIGATION UNDER THE TREATY MUST, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 171 OF THE TREATY, ENSURE WITHIN THE FIELDS COVERED BY THEIR RESPECTIVE POWERS THAT JUDGMENTS OF THE COURT ARE COMPLIED WITH. IF THE JUDGMENT DECLARES THAT CERTAIN LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS OF A MEMBER STATE ARE CONTRARY TO THE TREATY THE AUTHORITIES EXERCISING LEGISLATIVE POWER ARE THEN UNDER THE DUTY TO AMEND THE PROVISIONS IN QUESTION SO AS TO MAKE THEM CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF COMMUNITY LAW. FOR THEIR PART THE COURTS OF THE MEMBER STATE CONCERNED HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO ENSURE, WHEN PERFORMING THEIR DUTIES, THAT THE COURT' S JUDGMENT IS COMPLIED WITH.

2. IF THE COURT FINDS IN PROCEEDINGS UNDER ARTICLES 169 TO 171 OF THE TREATY THAT A MEMBER STATE' S LEGISLATION IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE OBLIGATIONS WHICH IT HAS UNDER THE TREATY, THE COURTS OF THAT STATE ARE BOUND BY VIRTUE OF ARTICLE 171 TO DRAW THE NECESSARY INFERENCES FROM THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT. HOWEVER, IT SHOULD BE UNDERSTOOD THAT WHERE THE COURT HAS FOUND THAT A MEMBER STATE HAS FAILED TO COMPLY WITH A PROVISION OF COMMUNITY LAW HAVING DIRECT EFFECT IN THE INTERNAL LEGAL ORDER, THE RIGHTS ACCRUING TO INDIVIDUALS DERIVE NOT FROM THE JUDGMENT FINDING THAT THAT STATE HAS FAILED TO FULFIL ITS OBLIGATIONS BUT FROM THE ACTUAL PROVISIONS OF COMMUNITY LAW.

Plný text judikátu (Entire text of the Judgment):