Odbor kompatibility s právem ES
Úřad vlády ČR
I S A P
Informační Systém pro Aproximaci Práva
Databáze č. 17 : Databáze judikatury
ă Odbor kompatibility s právem ES, Úřad vlády ČR - určeno pouze pro potřebu ministerstev a ostatních ústředních orgánů

Číslo (Kód CELEX):
Number (CELEX Code):
61989J0367
Název:
Title:
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF 4 OCTOBER 1991. CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST AIME RICHARDT AND LES ACCESSOIRES SCIENTIFIQUES SNC. REFERENCE FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING: COUR DE CASSATION - GRAND DUCHY OF LUXEMBURG. FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS - COMMUNITY TRANSIT - STRATEGIC MATERIAL. CASE C-367/89.
Publikace:
Publication:
REPORTS OF CASES 1991 PAGES I-4621
Předmět (klíčová slova):
Keywords
FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS;QUANTITATIVE RESTRICTIONS;MEASURES HAVING EQUIVALENT EFFECT;CUSTOMS UNION;
Související předpisy:
Corresponding acts:
377R0222
Odkaz na souvisejicí judikáty:
Corresponding Judgements:
Plný text:
Fulltext:
Ne

Fakta:


Názor soudu a komentář:


Shrnutí (Summary of the Judgment):
THE EXISTENCE, AS A CONSEQUENCE OF THE CUSTOMS UNION, OF A GENERAL PRINCIPLE OF FREEDOM OF TRANSIT OF GOODS WITHIN THE COMMUNITY DOES NOT, AS ARTICLE 10 OF REGULATION NO 222/77 AFFIRMS, HAVE THE EFFECT OF PRECLUDING THE MEMBER STATES FROM VERIFYING THE NATURE OF GOODS IN TRANSIT, PURSUANT TO THE TREATY, IN PARTICULAR ARTICLE 36. THAT ARTICLE AUTHORIZES THE MEMBER STATES TO IMPOSE RESTRICTIONS ON THE TRANSIT OF GOODS ON GROUNDS OF PUBLIC SECURITY, WHICH COVERS BOTH A MEMBER STATE' S INTERNAL SECURITY AND ITS EXTERNAL SECURITY, OF WHICH THE LATTER MANIFESTLY REQUIRES TO BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION IN THE CASE OF GOODS CAPABLE OF BEING USED FOR STRATEGIC PURPOSES. ACCORDINGLY, THE AFOREMENTIONED REGULATION DOES NOT PRECLUDE THE LEGISLATION OF A MEMBER STATE FROM REQUIRING, ON EXTERNAL SECURITY GROUNDS, THAT SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION MUST BE OBTAINED FOR THE TRANSIT THROUGH ITS TERRITORY OF GOODS DESCRIBED AS STRATEGIC MATERIAL, IRRESPECTIVE OF THE COMMUNITY TRANSIT DOCUMENT ISSUED BY ANOTHER MEMBER STATE. HOWEVER, T
HE MEASURES ADOPTED BY THE MEMBER STATE AS A CONSEQUENCE OF THE FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THAT REQUIREMENT MUST NOT BE DISPROPORTIONATE TO THE OBJECTIVE PURSUED.

Plný text judikátu (Entire text of the Judgment):