Odbor kompatibility s právem ES
Úřad vlády ČR
I S A P
Informační Systém pro Aproximaci Práva
Databáze č. 17 : Databáze judikatury
ă Odbor kompatibility s právem ES, Úřad vlády ČR - určeno pouze pro potřebu ministerstev a ostatních ústředních orgánů

Číslo (Kód CELEX):
Number (CELEX Code):		61988J0167
Název:
Title: 		JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF 8 JUNE 1989. ASSOCIATION GENERALE DES PRODUCTEURS DE BLE ET AUTRES CEREALES (AGPB) V OFFICE NATIONAL INTERPROFESSIONNEL DES CEREALES (ONIC). REFERENCE FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING : CONSEIL D' ETAT - FRANCE. AGRICULTURE - DIFFERENT QUANTITATIVE LIMITS FOR INTERVENTION BUYING FOR THE VARIOUS MEMBER STATES - ASSESSMENT OF VALIDITY. CASE 167/88..
Publikace:
Publication:		REPORTS OF CASES 1989 PAGES 1653
Předmět (klíčová slova):
Keywords		AGRICULTURE;CEREALS;
Související předpisy:
Corresponding acts:		386R0400;375R2727;376R1146;377R1629
Odkaz na souvisejicí judikáty:
Corresponding Judgements:
Plný text:
Fulltext:		Ne

Fakta:


Názor soudu a komentář:


Shrnutí (Summary of the Judgment):
1. REGULATION NO 2727/75, AS AMENDED BY REGULATION NO. 1143/76, PERMITS THE COMMISSION TO ADOPT SPECIAL INTERVENTION MEASURES WHICH VARY FROM ONE MEMBER STATE TO ANOTHER IN THE LIGHT OF POSSIBLE DIFFERENT TRENDS IN MARKET PRICES FOR CEREALS IN DIFFERENT REGIONS OF THE COMMUNITY. NEITHER THE COUNCIL IN GRANTING SUCH POWERS NOR THE COMMISSION IN EXERCISING THEM BY PROVIDING IN REGULATION NO 1629/77 FOR THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH VARIATIONS IN REGARD TO COMMON WHEAT OF BREADMAKING QUALITY AND BY ACTUALLY INTRODUCING THEM IN REGULATION NO 400/86 DISCRIMINATED AGAINST PRODUCERS IN THE COMMUNITY WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE SECOND SUBPARAGRAPH OF ARTICLE 40(3) OF THE TREATY OR DISCRIMINATED ON GROUNDS OF NATIONALITY WITHIN THE MEANING OF ARTICLE 7 THEREOF. THE COUNCIL APPLIED AN OBJECTIVE CRITERION WHEN IT AUTHORIZED THE COMMISSION TO ADOPT SPECIAL INTERVENTION MEASURES VARYING FROM REGION TO REGION AND THE COMMISSION DID NOT COMMIT ANY MANIFEST ERROR OF ASSESSMENT IN THE EXERCISE OF THE POWERS CONFERRED ON IT.

2. THE STATEMENT OF REASONS REQUIRED BY ARTICLE 190 OF THE TREATY MUST BE APPROPRIATE TO THE NATURE OF THE MEASURE IN QUESTION. IT MUST SHOW CLEARLY AND UNEQUIVOCALLY THE REASONING OF THE COMMUNITY AUTHORITY WHICH ADOPTED THE CONTESTED MEASURE SO AS TO INFORM THE PERSONS CONCERNED OF THE JUSTIFICATION FOR THE MEASURE ADOPTED AND ENABLE THE COURT TO EXERCISE ITS POWERS OF REVIEW. HOWEVER, THE STATEMENT OF REASONS IS NOT REQUIRED TO SPECIFY THE OFTEN VERY NUMEROUS AND COMPLEX MATTERS OF FACT OR LAW DEALT WITH IN REGULATIONS, PROVIDED THAT THE REGULATIONS FALL WITHIN THE GENERAL SCHEME OF THE BODY OF MEASURES OF WHICH THEY FORM PART.

Plný text judikátu (Entire text of the Judgment):