Odbor kompatibility s právem ES
Úřad vlády ČR
I S A P
Informační Systém pro Aproximaci Práva
Databáze č. 17 : Databáze judikatury
ă Odbor kompatibility s právem ES, Úřad vlády ČR - určeno pouze pro potřebu ministerstev a ostatních ústředních orgánů

Číslo (Kód CELEX):
Number (CELEX Code):
61981J0054
Název:
Title:
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (SECOND CHAMBER), 6 MAY 1982. FIRMA WILHELM FROMME V BUNDESANSTALT FUER LANDWIRTSCHAFTLICHE MARKTORDNUNG. (REFERENCE FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING FROM THE VERWALTUNGSGERICHT FRANKFURT AM MAIN). WRONGLY-PAID DENATURING PREMIUMS - INTEREST. CASE 54/81.
Publikace:
Publication:
REPORTS OF CASES 1982 PAGES 1449 - 1465
Předmět (klíčová slova):
Keywords
AGRICULTURE;CEREALS;FINANCIAL PROVISIONS;OWN RESOURCES;
Související předpisy:
Corresponding acts:
Odkaz na souvisejicí judikáty:
Corresponding Judgements:
Plný text:
Fulltext:
Ne

Fakta:


Názor soudu a komentář:


Shrnutí (Summary of the Judgment):
1. IN SO FAR AS COMMUNITY LAW HAS NOT PROVIDED OTHERWISE ACTIONS FOR THE RECOVERY OF SUMS WHICH HAVE BEEN WRONGLY PAID UNDER COMMUNITY LAW MUST BE DECIDED BY NATIONAL COURTS. IN PARTICULAR, IT IS FOR THE NATIONAL AUTHORITIES TO SETTLE ALL ANCILLARY QUESTIONS RELATING TO SUCH RECOVERY, SUCH AS THE QUESTION OF PAYMENT OF INTEREST. HOWEVER, THE APPLICATION OF NATIONAL LAW MUST NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE SCOPE OR IMPAIR THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COMMUNITY LAW BY MAKING THE RECOVERY OF SUMS WRONGLY PAID IMPOSSIBLE IN PRACTICE. NOR MAY IT MAKE THE RECOVERY OF SUCH SUMS SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS OR DETAILED RULES LESS FAVOURABLE THAN THOSE WHICH APPLY TO SIMILAR PROCEDURES GOVERNED BY NATIONAL LAW ALONE. IN SUCH MATTERS THE NATIONAL AUTHORITIES MUST PROCEED WITH THE SAME CARE AS THEY EXERCISE IN IMPLEMENTING CORRESPONDING NATIONAL LAWS SO AS NOT TO IMPAIR, IN ANY WAY, THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COMMUNITY LAW.

2. IT IS COMPATIBLE WITH COMMUNITY LAW IN ITS PRESENT STATE FOR A MEMBER STATE TO CHARGE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF ITS OWN NATIONAL LAW, INTEREST ON WRONGLY-PAID COMMUNITY DE NATURING PREMIUMS PROVIDED THAT THOSE RULES DO NOT GIVE RISE TO ANY DIFFERENCE IN TREATMENT WHICH IS NOT OBJECTIVELY JUSTIFIED BETWEEN TRADERS RECEIVING SUCH PREMIUMS AND THOSE WHO, AS THE CASE MAY BE, OBTAIN SIMILAR BENEFITS OF A PURELY NATIONAL NATURE.

Plný text judikátu (Entire text of the Judgment):