Odbor kompatibility s právem ES
Úřad vlády ČR
I S A P
Informační Systém pro Aproximaci Práva
Databáze č. 17 : Databáze judikatury
ă Odbor kompatibility s právem ES, Úřad vlády ČR - určeno pouze pro potřebu ministerstev a ostatních ústředních orgánů

Číslo (Kód CELEX):
Number (CELEX Code):		61962J0025
Název:
Title: 		JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF 15 JULY 1963. PLAUMANN AND CO. V COMMISSION OF THE EEC. CASE 25-62.
Publikace:
Publication:		REPORTS OF CASES 1963 PAGES 0095 DANISH EDITION....: 1963 PAGES 0411
Předmět (klíčová slova):
Keywords		FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS;CUSTOMS UNION;COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF;QUOTAS - THIRD COUNTRIES;AGRICULTURE;FRUIT AND VEGETABLES;
Související předpisy:
Corresponding acts:
Odkaz na souvisejicí judikáty:
Corresponding Judgements:
Plný text:
Fulltext:		Ne

Fakta:


Názor soudu a komentář:


Shrnutí (Summary of the Judgment):
1. A MEASURE MUST BE CONSIDERED AS A DECISION IF IT REFERS TO A PARTICULAR PERSON AND BINDS THAT PERSON ALONE.

2. THE WORDS AND THE NATURAL MEANING OF THE SECOND PARAGRAPH OF ARTICLE 173 OF THE EEC TREATY WHICH ALLOWS AN INDIVIDUAL TO INSTITUTE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST DECISIONS ADDRESSED TO ANOTHER PERSON WHICH ARE OF DIRECT AND INDIVIDUAL CONCERN TO THE FORMER JUSTIFY THE BROADEST INTERPRETATION.

3. THE PROVISIONS OF THE TREATY REGARDING THE RIGHT OF ACTION OF INTERESTED PARTIES MUST NOT BE INTERPRETED RESTRICTIVELY; WHERE THE TREATY IS SILENT A LIMITATION IN THIS RESPECT MAY NOT BE PRESUMED.

4. PERSONS OTHER THAN THOSE TO WHOM A DECISION IS ADDRESSED MAY ONLY CLAIM TO BE INDIVIDUALLY CONCERNED IF THAT DECISION AFFECTS THEM BY REASON OF CERTAIN ATTRIBUTES WHICH ARE PECULIAR TO THEM OR BY REASON OF CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH THEY ARE DIFFERENTIATED FROM ALL OTHER PERSONS, AND BY VIRTUE OF THESE FACTORS DISTINGUISHES THEM INDIVIDUALLY JUST AS IN THE CASE OF THE PERSON ADDRESSED.

5. IF AN APPLICANT INCLUDES IN HIS APPLICATION A REQUEST FOR A DECLARATION WITH REGARD TO THE DAMAGE WHICH MAY RESULT FROM THE CONTESTED MEASURE AND SPECIFIES IN THE COURSE OF THE WRITTEN AND ORAL PROCEDURES THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THAT REQUEST AND SETS A VALUE ON THE AMOUNT OF THE DAMAGE, THE CONCLUSIONS OF AN APPLICATION FOR COMPENSATION FORMULATED IN THE REPLY MAY BE CONSIDERED AS AN AMPLIFICATION OF THOSE CONTAINED IN THE APPLICATION AND THEREFORE AS ADMISSIBLE UNDER ARTICLE 38 (1) (D) OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE.

6. AN ADMINISTRATIVE MEASURE WHICH HAS NOT BEEN ANNULLED CANNOT OF ITSELF CONSTITUTE A WRONGFUL ACT ON THE PART OF THE ADMINISTRATION INFLICTING DAMAGE UPON THOSE WHOM IT AFFECTS. THE LATTER CANNOT THEREFORE CLAIM DAMAGES BY REASON OF THAT MEASURE.

Plný text judikátu (Entire text of the Judgment):