Odbor kompatibility s právem ES
Úřad vlády ČR
I S A P
Informační Systém pro Aproximaci Práva
Databáze č. 17 : Databáze judikatury
ă Odbor kompatibility s právem ES, Úřad vlády ČR - určeno pouze pro potřebu ministerstev a ostatních ústředních orgánů

Číslo (Kód CELEX):
Number (CELEX Code):		61982J0139
Název:
Title: 		JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (THIRD CHAMBER), 5 MAY 1983. PAOLA PISCITELLO V ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DELLA PREVIDENZA SOCIALE (INPS). REFERENCE FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING FROM THE ITALIAN CORTE DI CASSAZIONE. SOCIAL SECURITY - SOCIAL AID PENSION - TRANSFER. CASE 139/82.
Publikace:
Publication:		REPORTS OF CASES 1983 PAGES 1427 - 1443
Předmět (klíčová slova):
Keywords		SOCIAL SECURITY FOR MIGRANT WORKERS;
Související předpisy:
Corresponding acts:		371R1408;371R1408;371R1408;371R1408;157E051
Odkaz na souvisejicí judikáty:
Corresponding Judgements:
Plný text:
Fulltext:		Ne

Fakta:


Názor soudu a komentář:


Shrnutí (Summary of the Judgment):
1. THE FACT THAT A SOCIAL AID PENSION IS GRANTED UNDER NATIONAL LAW BY WAY OF ASSISTANCE IS NOT IN ITSELF SUFFICIENT TO EXCLUDE THAT BENEFIT, UNDER COMMUNITY LAW, FROM THE FIELD OF APPLICATION RATIONAE MATERIAE OF REGULATION NO 1408/71, SINCE THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN BENEFITS WHICH ARE EXLUDED FROM THE SCOPE OF THAT REGULATION AND BENEFITS WHICH COME WITHIN IT RESTS ESSENTIALLY ON THE FACTORS RELATING TO EACH BENEFIT, IN PARTICULAR ITS PURPOSE AND THE CONDITIONS FOR ITS GRANT.

2. A SOCIAL AID PENSION WHICH, IN THE FIRST PLACE, CONFERS ON RECIPIENTS A LEGALLY DEFINED STATUS WHICH IS NOT CONDITIONAL UPON ANY DISCRETIONARY INDIVIDUAL ASSESSMENT OF THEIR PERSONAL NEEDS OR CIRCUMSTANCES, AND, SECONDLY, MAY BE PAID AS A SUPPLEMENT TO THE INCOME OF RECIPIENTS OF SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS, FALLS IN PRINCIPLE WITHIN THE FIELD OF SOCIAL SECURITY REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 51 OF THE EEC TREATY AND IS NOT EXCLUDED FROM THE SCOPE OF REGULATION NO 1408/71 BY THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 4 (4) THEREOF.

3. A SOCIAL AID PENSION WHICH IS PAID ON THE BASIS OF OBJECTIVE CRITERIA TO ELDERLY NATIONALS IN ORDER TO PROVIDE THEM WITH THE MINIMUM MEANS OF SUBSISTENCE MUST BE ASSIMILATED TO AN OLD-AGE BENEFIT WITHIN THE MEANING OF ARTICLE 4 (1) (C) OF REGULATION NO 1408/71 AND IS INCLUDED AMONGST THE BENEFITS REFERRED TO IN THE FIRST SUBPARAGRAPH OF ARTICLE 10 (1) OF THE SAME REGULATION. SINCE THE REGULATION IN QUESTION DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY SPECIFIC PROVISIONS RELATING TO THAT PENSION, THE WAIVER OF RESIDENCE CLAUSES PROVIDED FOR IN ARTICLE 10 (1) OF THAT REGULATION MUST BE TAKEN TO APPLY TO THE BENEFIT IN QUESTION.

Plný text judikátu (Entire text of the Judgment):