Odbor kompatibility s právem ES
Úřad vlády ČR
I S A P
Informační Systém pro Aproximaci Práva
Databáze č. 17 : Databáze judikatury
ă Odbor kompatibility s právem ES, Úřad vlády ČR - určeno pouze pro potřebu ministerstev a ostatních ústředních orgánů

Číslo (Kód CELEX):
Number (CELEX Code):		61990J0045
Název:
Title: 		JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF 3 JUNE 1992. ALBERTO PALETTA AND OTHERS V BRENNET AG. REFERENCE FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING: ARBEITSGERICHT LOERRACH - GERMANY. SOCIAL SECURITY - RECOGNITION OF INCAPACITY FOR WORK. CASE C-45/90.
Publikace:
Publication:		REPORTS OF CASES 1992 PAGES I-3423
Předmět (klíčová slova):
Keywords		SOCIAL SECURITY FOR MIGRANT WORKERS;
Související předpisy:
Corresponding acts:		372R0574;372R0574;372R0574;372R0574;372R0574
Odkaz na souvisejicí judikáty:
Corresponding Judgements:
Plný text:
Fulltext:		Ne

Fakta:


Názor soudu a komentář:


Shrnutí (Summary of the Judgment):
1. WHETHER A BENEFIT FALLS WITHIN THE SCOPE OF REGULATION NO 1408/71 OR NOT ESSENTIALLY DEPENDS ON THE FUNDAMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE BENEFIT, IN PARTICULAR ITS PURPOSE AND THE CONDITIONS FOR ITS GRANT, AND NOT ON WHETHER OR NOT THE NATIONAL LEGISLATION DESCRIBES THE BENEFIT AS A SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFIT. THE BENEFITS PROVIDED BY THE EMPLOYER TO THE WORKER BY WAY OF MAINTENANCE OF WAGES IN THE EVENT OF ILLNESS, PAYMENT OF WHICH FOR A PERIOD OF UP TO SIX WEEKS SUSPENDS PAYMENT OF THE DAILY SICKNESS BENEFITS PROVIDED FOR BY NATIONAL SOCIAL SECURITY LEGISLATION, CONSTITUTE SICKNESS BENEFITS WITHIN THE MEANING OF ARTICLE 4(1) OF REGULATION NO 1408/71. THE FACT THAT THE FINANCIAL BURDEN OF THOSE BENEFITS RESTS ON THE EMPLOYER CANNOT REMOVE THOSE BENEFITS FROM THE SCOPE OF THAT REGULATION SINCE CLASSIFICATION OF AN ALLOWANCE AS A SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFIT COVERED BY THE REGULATION DOES NOT DEPEND UPON THE MANNER IN WHICH IT IS FINANCED.

2. ARTICLE 18(1) TO (4) OF REGULATION NO 574/72 SHOULD BE INTERPRETED AS MEANING THAT THE COMPETENT INSTITUTION, EVEN WHERE THIS IS THE EMPLOYER AND NOT A SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION, IS BOUND IN FACT AND IN LAW BY THE MEDICAL FINDINGS MADE BY THE INSTITUTION OF THE PLACE OF RESIDENCE OR TEMPORARY RESIDENCE CONCERNING THE COMMENCEMENT AND DURATION OF THE INCAPACITY FOR WORK, WHEN IT DOES NOT HAVE THE PERSON CONCERNED EXAMINED BY A DOCTOR OF ITS CHOICE, AS IT MAY DO UNDER ARTICLE 18(5). PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES COMPLAINED OF BY AN EMPLOYER WHO WAS NOT ABLE TO MAKE GOOD USE OF THE POSSIBILITY OFFERED BY ARTICLE 18(5) OF REGULATION NO 574/72 CANNOT CALL IN QUESTION THE INTERPRETATION OF ONE OF THE PROVISIONS OF THAT REGULATION, AS IT FOLLOWS FROM ITS WORDING AND PURPOSE.

Plný text judikátu (Entire text of the Judgment):