Odbor kompatibility s právem ES
Úřad vlády ČR
I S A P
Informační Systém pro Aproximaci Práva
Databáze č. 17 : Databáze judikatury
ă Odbor kompatibility s právem ES, Úřad vlády ČR - určeno pouze pro potřebu ministerstev a ostatních ústředních orgánů

Číslo (Kód CELEX):
Number (CELEX Code):		61978J0265
Název:
Title: 		JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF 5 MARCH 1980. H. FERWERDA B.V. V PRODUKTSCHAP VOOR VEE EN VLEES. PRELIMINARY RULING REQUESTED BY THE COLLEGE VAN BEROEP VOOR HET BEDRIJFSLEVEN, THE HAGUE. REFUNDS WRONGLY MADE. CASE 265-78.
Publikace:
Publication:		REPORTS OF CASES 1980 PAGES 0617
Předmět (klíčová slova):
Keywords		AGRICULTURE;BEEF AND VEAL;OWN RESOURCES;
Související předpisy:
Corresponding acts:		369R1957
Odkaz na souvisejicí judikáty:
Corresponding Judgements:
Plný text:
Fulltext:		Ne

Fakta:


Názor soudu a komentář:


Shrnutí (Summary of the Judgment):
1. THE GENERAL ARRANGEMENTS REGARDING THE FINANCIAL PROVISIONS OF THE TREATY ARE GOVERNED BY THE GENERAL PRINCIPLE OF EQUALITY WHICH REQUIRES THAT COMPARABLE SITUATIONS MAY NOT BE TREATED DIFFERENTLY UNLESS DIFFERENCE OF TREATMENT IS OBJECTIVELY JUSTIFIED. IT FOLLOWS THAT THE REVENUES WHICH ARE CONTRIBUTED TO THE COMMUNITY BUDGET AND THE FINANCIAL ADVANTAGES CHARGED THERETO MUST BE SO ARRANGED AND APPLIED AS TO CONSTITUTE A UNIFORM BURDEN OR CONFER UNIFORM BENEFITS ON ALL PERSONS WHO MEET THE CONDITIONS SPECIFIED IN THE COMMUNITY PROVISIONS ON SUCH BURDENS OR ADVANTAGES.

2. DISPUTES IN CONNEXION WITH THE REIMBURSEMENT OF AMOUNTS COLLECTED FOR THE COMMUNITY ARE THUS A MATTER FOR THE NATIONAL COURTS AND MUST BE SETTLED BY THEM UNDER NATIONAL LAW IN SO FAR AS NO PROVISIONS OF COMMUNITY LAW ARE RELEVANT. IN THOSE CIRCUMSTANCES IT IS FOR THE COURTS OF THE MEMBER STATES TO PROVIDE, IN PURSUANCE OF THE REQUIREMENT OF CO-OPERATION EMBODIED IN ARTICLE 5 OF THE DIRECT EFFECT OF THE COMMUNITY PROVISIONS BOTH WHEN SUCH PROVISIONS CREATE OBLIGATIONS FOR THE SUBJECT AND WHEN THEY CONFER RIGHTS ON HIM. IT IS THUS FOR THE NATIONAL LEGAL SYSTEM OF EACH MEMBER STATE TO DETERMINE THE COURTS HAVING JURISDICTION AND TO FIX THE PROCEDURES FOR APPLICATIONS TO THE COURTS INTENDED TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS WHICH THE SUBJECT OBTAINS THROUGH THE DIRECT EFFECT OF COMMUNITY LAW BUT SUCH PROCEDURES MAY NOT BE LESS FAVOURABLE THAN THOSE IN SIMILAR PROCEDURES CONCERNING INTERNAL MATTERS AND MAY IN NO CASE BE LAID DOWN IN SUCH A WAY AS TO RENDER IMPOSSIBLE IN PRACTICE THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHTS WHICH THE NAT
IONAL COURTS MUST PROTECT. SUCH CONSIDERATIONS APPLY BOTH WHERE THERE IS AN EXPRESS REFERENCE TO NATIONAL LAWS AS THERE IS IN ARTICLE 8 OF REGULATION NO 729/70, AND WHERE AN IMPLIED REFERENCE IS MADE TO SUCH LAWS.

3. COMMUNITY LAW IN ITS PRESENT STATE AND ARTICLE 6 (5) OF REGULATION NO 1957/69 IN PARTICULAR DO NOT PRECLUDE THE APPLICATION, IN PROCEEDINGS CONCERNING THE RECOVERY BY THE AUTHORITIES OF THE MEMBER STATES OF SUMS PAID IN ERROR AS EXPORT REFUNDS TO TRADERS, OF A PRINCIPLE OF LEGAL CERTAINTY BASED ON NATIONAL LAW WHEREBY FINANCIAL BENEFITS GRANTED IN ERROR BY THE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES MAY NOT BE RECOVERED IF THE ERROR COMMITTED WAS NOT DUE TO INCORRECT INFORMATION SUPPLIED BY THE BENEFICIARY OR IF SUCH ERROR, DESPITE THE FACT THAT THE INFORMATION SUPPLIED WAS INCORRECT THOUGH SUPPLIED IN GOOD FAITH, COULD EASILY HAVE BEEN AVOIDED.

Plný text judikátu (Entire text of the Judgment):