Odbor kompatibility s právem ES
Úřad vlády ČR
I S A P
Informační Systém pro Aproximaci Práva
Databáze č. 17 : Databáze judikatury
ă Odbor kompatibility s právem ES, Úřad vlády ČR - určeno pouze pro potřebu ministerstev a ostatních ústředních orgánů

Číslo (Kód CELEX):
Number (CELEX Code):		61991J0320
Název:
Title: 		JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF 19 MAY 1993. CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST PAUL CORBEAU. REFERENCE FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING: TRIBUNAL CORRECTIONNEL DE LIEGE - BELGIUM. COMPETITION - POSTAL MONOPOLY - EXTENT. CASE C-320/91.
Publikace:
Publication:		REPORTS OF CASES 1993 PAGES I-2533
Předmět (klíčová slova):
Keywords		COMPETITION;RULES APPLYING TO UNDERTAKINGS;DOMINANT POSITION;STATE MONOPOLIES OF A COMMERCIAL CHARACTER;
Související předpisy:
Corresponding acts:		157E090
Odkaz na souvisejicí judikáty:
Corresponding Judgements:
Plný text:
Fulltext:		Ne

Fakta:


Názor soudu a komentář:


Shrnutí (Summary of the Judgment):
IT IS CONTRARY TO ARTICLE 90 OF THE EEC TREATY FOR LEGISLATION OF A MEMBER STATE WHICH CONFERS ON A BODY SUCH AS THE RÉGIE DES POSTES THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO COLLECT, CARRY AND DISTRIBUTE MAIL, TO PROHIBIT, UNDER THREAT OF CRIMINAL PENALTIES, AN ECONOMIC OPERATOR ESTABLISHED IN THAT STATE FROM OFFERING CERTAIN SPECIFIC SERVICES, DISSOCIABLE FROM THE SERVICE OF GENERAL INTEREST, WHICH MEET THE SPECIAL NEEDS OF ECONOMIC OPERATORS AND CALL FOR CERTAIN ADDITIONAL SERVICES NOT OFFERED BY THE TRADITIONAL POSTAL SERVICE, IN SO FAR AS THOSE SERVICES DO NOT COMPROMISE THE ECONOMIC EQUILIBRIUM OF THE SERVICE OF GENERAL ECONOMIC INTEREST PERFORMED BY THE HOLDER OF THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT. ALTHOUGH THE OBLIGATION FOR THE HOLDER OF THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO PERFORM A TASK OF GENERAL INTEREST BY PERFORMING ITS SERVICES IN CONDITIONS OF ECONOMIC EQUILIBRIUM PRESUPPOSES THAT IT WILL BE POSSIBLE TO OFFSET LESS PROFITABLE SECTORS AGAINST THE PROFITABLE SECTORS AND HENCE JUSTIFIES A RESTRICTION OF COMPETITION FROM INDIVIDUAL UNDERTAKIN
GS WHERE THE ECONOMICALLY PROFITABLE SECTORS ARE CONCERNED, SUCH A RESTRICTION OF COMPETITION IS, HOWEVER, NOT JUSTIFIED IN ALL CASES. IN PARTICULAR IT IS NOT PERMISSIBLE AS REGARDS SPECIFIC SERVICES WHICH MAY BE DISSOCIATED FROM THE SERVICE OF GENERAL INTEREST, WHICH MEET SPECIAL NEEDS OF ECONOMIC OPERATORS AND WHICH CALL FOR CERTAIN ADDITIONAL SERVICES SUCH AS, WHERE THE CARRIAGE OF MAIL IS CONCERNED, COLLECTION FROM THE SENDER' S ADDRESS, GREATER SPEED OR RELIABILITY OF DISTRIBUTION OR THE POSSIBILITY OF CHANGING THE DESTINATION IN THE COURSE OF TRANSIT, WHICH THE TRADITIONAL POSTAL SERVICE DOES NOT OFFER, IN SO FAR AS SUCH SPECIFIC SERVICES, BY THEIR NATURE AND THE CONDITIONS IN WHICH THEY ARE OFFERED, SUCH AS THE GEOGRAPHICAL AREA IN WHICH THEY ARE PROVIDED, DO NOT COMPROMISE THE ECONOMIC EQUILIBRIUM OF THE SERVICE OF GENERAL ECONOMIC INTEREST PERFORMED BY THE HOLDER OF THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT.

Plný text judikátu (Entire text of the Judgment):